Varadhan R, Segal JB, Boyd CM, Wu AW, Weiss CO. A framework for the analysis of heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66:818–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.009.

Rekkas A, Paulus JK, Raman G, Wong JB, Steyerberg EW, Rijnbeek PR, et al. Predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: A scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2020;20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01145-1.

Kent DM, Paulus JK, Klaveren D van, D’Agostino R, Goodman S, Hayward R, et al. The predictive approaches to treatment effect heterogeneity (PATH) statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2019;172:35. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-3667.

Kent DM, Klaveren D van, Paulus JK, D’Agostino R, Goodman S, Hayward R, et al. The predictive approaches to treatment effect heterogeneity (PATH) statement: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2019;172:W1. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-3668.

Klaveren D van, Balan TA, Steyerberg EW, Kent DM. Models with interactions overestimated heterogeneity of treatment effects and were prone to treatment mistargeting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;114:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.029.

Kent DM, Rothwell PM, Ioannidis JP, Altman DG, Hayward RA. Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: A proposal. Trials 2010;11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-85.

Kent DM, Nelson J, Dahabreh IJ, Rothwell PM, Altman DG, Hayward RA. Risk and treatment effect heterogeneity: Re-analysis of individual participant data from 32 large clinical trials. International Journal of Epidemiology 2016:dyw118. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw118.

Burke JF, Hayward RA, Nelson JP, Kent DM. Using internally developed risk models to assess heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2014;7:163–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000497.

Abadie A, Chingos MM, West MR. Endogenous stratification in randomized experiments. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2018;100:567–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00732.

Harrell FE, Lee KL, Pollock BG. Regression models in clinical studies: Determining relationships between predictors and response. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1988;80:1198–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/80.15.1198.

Klaveren D van, Steyerberg EW, Serruys PW, Kent DM. The proposed “concordance-statistic for benefit” provided a useful metric when modeling heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2018;94:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.021.

Califf RM, Woodlief LH, Harrell FE, Lee KL, White HD, Guerci A, et al. Selection of thrombolytic therapy for individual patients: Development of a clinical model. American Heart Journal 1997;133:630–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70164-9.

Steyerberg EW, Bossuyt PMM, Lee KL. Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics? American Heart Journal 2000;139:745–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90001-2.

Rothwell PM. Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients? The Lancet 1995;345:1616–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90120-5.

Rysavy MA, Li L, Tyson JE, Jensen EA, Das A, Ambalavanan N, et al. Should vitamin a injections to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death be reserved for high-risk infants? Reanalysis of the national institute of child health and human development neonatal research network randomized trial. The Journal of Pediatrics 2021;236:78–85.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.05.022.

Sussman JB, Kent DM, Nelson JP, Hayward RA. Improving diabetes prevention with benefit based tailored treatment: Risk based reanalysis of diabetes prevention program. BMJ 2015;350:h454–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h454.

Glasziou PP, Irwig LM. An evidence based approach to individualising treatment. BMJ 1995;311:1356–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1356.

Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S. Generalized random forests. The Annals of Statistics 2019;47. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-aos1709.

Lu M, Sadiq S, Feaster DJ, Ishwaran H. Estimating individual treatment effect in observational data using random forest methods. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2018;27:209–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2017.1356325.

Wager S, Athey S. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2018;113:1228–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1319839.

Powers S, Qian J, Jung K, Schuler A, Shah NH, Hastie T, et al. Some methods for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in high dimensions. Statistics in Medicine 2018;37:1767–87.

Farooq V, Van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A, et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: Development and validation of SYNTAX score II. The Lancet 2013;381:639–50.

Takahashi K, Serruys PW, Fuster V, Farkouh ME, Spertus JA, Cohen DJ, et al. Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: Secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation. The Lancet 2020;396:1399–412.

Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies. vol. 330. Springer; 2017.

Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. The integrated calibration index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models. Statistics in Medicine 2019;38:4051–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8281.